Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dengan Pendekatan Metode AHP dan BORDA
Keywords:
faculty performance evaluation, AHP approach, Borda approach, faculty performance evaluation, AHP approach, borda approachAbstract
This research aims to investigate the evaluation of faculty performance by utilizing a combined approach of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Borda Method. The primary objective of this study is to develop a more structured, objective, and inclusive evaluation framework for assessing faculty performance. The AHP method is employed to address the complexity of determining the weights of evaluation criteria and sub-criteria, while the Borda Method provides a platform for various stakeholders to express their assessments in a participatory manner. This study is conducted using a qualitative research approach. Data is collected through surveys administered to students, colleagues, and administrators to provide evaluations of faculty performance based on predetermined criteria. The research results indicate that the combined approach of AHP and Borda is capable of offering a more accurate and holistic depiction of faculty performance. The AHP method assists in reducing subjectivity in weight determination, while the Borda Method facilitates the inclusion of opinions from various stakeholders.
References
T. Saaty, Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, 1980.
G.-H. Tzeng and J.-J. Huang, Buku Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, no. 1. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
K. J. Arrow and H. Raynaud, Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
P. C. Fishburn, The Theory of Social Choice, vol. 3, no. 1. Princeton University Press, 1973.
R. Waluyo, I. Setiawan, and V. Wulandari, “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Borda untuk Seleksi Penerima Pembebasan Operasional Sekolah,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 683, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2021842743.
M. Hussain, M. M. Ajmal, M. Khan, and H. Saber, “Competitive priorities and knowledge management: An empirical investigation of manufacturing companies in UAE,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 791–806, 2015, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-03-2014-0020.
S. Saefudin and S. Wahyuningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Pada RSUD Serang,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2017, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v1i0.78.
E. Darmanto, N. Latifah, and N. Susanti, “Penerapan Metode Ahp (Analythic Hierarchy Process) Untuk Menentukan Kualitas Gula Tumbu,” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2014, doi: 10.24176/simet.v5i1.139.
N. A. Sari, B. Widada, and T. Susyanto, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Framework Laravel,” Script, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2015.
A. Sudradjat, M. Sodiqin, and I. Komarudin, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Terhadap Pemilihan Merek CCTV,” J. Infortech, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2020, doi: 10.31294/infortech.v2i1.7660.
F. A. Surya, E. Haerani, F. Wulandari, and S. Ramadhani, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada Sistem Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Terhadap Kualitas Kinerja Sekolah,” J. Nas. Komputasi dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 235–242, 2022, doi: 10.32672/jnkti.v5i2.4185.
A. Supriadi, A. Rustandi, D. H. L. Komarlina, and G. T. Ardiani, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Teknik Penentuan Strategi Daya Saing Kerajinan Bordir. 2018.
W. Budianta, “Pemetaan Kawasan Rawan Tanah Longsor di Kecamatan Gedangsari, Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. (Indonesian J. Community Engag., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 68, 2021, doi: 10.22146/jpkm.45637.
I. M. Yudiana, P. Sugiartawan, and D. Suprihanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Promosi Jabatan Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Profile Matching,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Komput. Terap. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2022, doi: 10.33173/jsikti.126.
N. Cintya Resti, N. Fadilatul Ilmiyah, and I. Kediri, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dan Metode Borda Count Dalam Optimalisasi Pemilihan Kandidat Terbaik Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Ris. Ap. Mat, vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 179–192, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26740/jram.v6n2.p179-192.
M. A. Budhi and R. Wardoyo, “Group Decision Support System Determination Of Best Employee Using Topsis And Borda,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 165, 2017, doi: 10.22146/ijccs.22773.
A. Arifa and H. Santoso, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok untuk Penentuan Usulan Lokasi Pendirian Minimarket,” J. Tek. Komput. AMIK BSI, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 174–180, 2022, doi: 10.31294/jtk.v4i2.
J. Rothe, “Borda Count in Collective Decision Making: A Summary of Recent Results,” Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 9830–9836, 2019, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019830.
T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Methods , Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Second Edition, vol. 175. Springer, 2012.
R. Ananda and M. Fadhli, Statistik Pendidikan. Medan: Penerbit CV. Widya Puspita, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi (SISFOTEK)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0