Efektivitas Zoom sebagai Platform Pembelajaran Hybrid dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Mahasiswa

Authors

  • Fatwa Arrevi Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Binastya Anggara Sekti Universitas Esa Unggul

Keywords:

zoom, hybrid learning, student participation, online education, COVID-19

Abstract

In the current digital era, hybrid learning has emerged as an effective method in higher education. With the rapid adoption of online learning tools during the COVID-19 pandemic, Zoom has become a popular choice for educational institutions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Zoom as a hybrid learning platform in increasing student participation. Through a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, interviews, and participation data analysis, we explored how Zoom's features impact student engagement in a hybrid learning environment. Findings indicate that interactive features such as breakout rooms and polling contribute to increased student participation. However, technical issues and digital fatigue remain challenges. This research provides valuable insights for educators and institutions seeking to optimize hybrid learning experiences and enhance student engagement.

References

L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, “Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 1, p. 100012, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012.

C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, and M. Koole, “Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 923–945, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.

G. Carmi, “E-Learning using zoom: A study of students’ attitude and learning effectiveness in higher education,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e30229, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30229.

T. K. F. Chiu, “Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. sup1, pp. S14–S30, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998.

C. B. Mpungose, “Lecturers’ reflections on use of Zoom video conferencing technology for e-learning at a South African university in the context of coronavirus,” African Identities, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 266–282, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14725843.2021.1902268.

T. E. Shim and S. Y. Lee, “College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 119, p. 105578, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578.

W. Bao, “COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113–115, Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.

S. Vandenberg and M. Magnuson, “A comparison of student and faculty attitudes on the use of Zoom, a video conferencing platform: A mixed-methods study,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 54, p. 103138, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103138.

C. W. H. Chan et al., “Effect of simulation-based zoom learning on clinical decision-making among undergraduate nursing students and experiences of students and instructors: A mixed methods study,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e30039, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30039.

Y. Jiang, J. Lee, Z. Wan, and J. Chen, “Stricter Teacher, More Motivated Students? Comparing the Associations Between Teacher Behaviors and Motivational Beliefs of Western and East Asian Learners,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 564327, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564327.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-24

How to Cite

Fatwa Arrevi, & Binastya Anggara Sekti. (2024). Efektivitas Zoom sebagai Platform Pembelajaran Hybrid dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Mahasiswa. Prosiding SISFOTEK, 8(1), 209 - 212. Retrieved from http://seminar.iaii.or.id/index.php/SISFOTEK/article/view/487

Issue

Section

Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.