Studi Literatur: Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Pemrograman dengan Sistem Berbasis AI
Keywords:
optimization, learning, programming, system, AIAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has opened up new opportunities in various fields, including education. AI makes it possible to optimize the teaching-learning process in the context of programming learning, which is often considered challenging by many students. This research aims to explore the potential for optimizing programming learning through the implementation of an AI-based online learning system. The method used is a literature study, which involves researching various sources that discuss the use of AI in education, particularly in the context of programming learning. The literature approach includes analyzing and synthesizing data from journals, books, and conference articles that discuss AI techniques such as machine learning, recommendation systems, and real-time feedback. The results show that using AI in online learning platforms can increase student engagement, accelerate feedback, and improve personalization of learning materials. However, there are some challenges when implementing these systems, such as the need for adequate technological infrastructure and teacher training. In conclusion, although AI has a lot of potential to optimize programming learning, effective implementation requires technical and pedagogical considerations. According to this study, further research is needed to overcome implementation barriers and assess the long-term effects of using AI in programming education.
References
K. Zhang and A. B. Aslan, “AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100025, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025.
S. Martínez-Fernández et al., “Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1–58, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3487043.
C. W. Okonkwo and A. Ade-Ibijola, “Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100033, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033.
M. Rohandi, A. A. Kadim, and J. Pakaja, “Ikhtisar Strategi Pembelajaran Pemrograman: Sebuah Integrative Review,” Inverted: Journal of Information Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37905/inverted.v3i2.21207.
R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and B. Sánchez Viveros, “A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 109, no. 0318, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349.
S. Pambudi, T. Sukardiyono, and H. D. Surjono, “The Development of Mobile Gamification Learning Application for Web Programming Learning,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1140, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012046.
D. Sun, A. Boudouaia, C. Zhu, and Y. Li, “Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5.
D. Foung, L. Lin, and J. Chen, “Reinventing assessments with ChatGPT and other online tools: Opportunities for GenAI-empowered assessment practices,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. January, p. 100250, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100250.
C. Stöhr, A. W. Ou, and H. Malmström, “Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, no. August 2023, p. 100259, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259.
M. Imran and N. Almusharraf, “Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: a review of emerging educational technology,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00310-z.
R. Mori, M. Okawa, Y. Tokumaru, Y. Niwa, N. Matsuhashi, and M. Futamura, “Application of an artificial intelligence-based system in the diagnosis of breast ultrasound images obtained using a smartphone,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03286-1.
M. Bim, P. Using, and V. Programming, “Structural Optimization of Trusses in Building Information,” 2024.
K. Hartley, M. Hayak, and U. H. Ko, “Artificial Intelligence Supporting Independent Student Learning: An Evaluative Case Study of ChatGPT and Learning to Code,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14020120.
S. Jin et al., “Enhancing Architectural Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of an AI-Assisted Architectural Programming and Design Course,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14061613.
C. Schwenke, M. Förster, J. Brasse, and M. Klier, “START Foundation: Coping with Bias and Fairness when Implementing and Using an AI System,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 54, pp. 1036–1047, 2024, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.05443.
I. Pesovski, R. Santos, R. Henriques, and V. Trajkovik, “Generative AI for Customizable Learning Experiences,” Sustainability (Switzerland) , vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16073034.
E. I. Baungarten-Leon, S. Ortega-Cisneros, M. Abdelmoneum, R. Y. Vidana Morales, and G. Pinedo-Diaz, “The Genesis of AI by AI Integrated Circuit: Where AI Creates AI,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13091704.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi (SISFOTEK)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
