Bibliometrik Analysis: Kontruksi Sosial Masyarakat Mengenai Teknologi AI Pada Data Base Scoupus 2014-2024
Keywords:
Social Construction, Society, Artificial Intelligence, Scopus, BibliometrikAbstract
This research investigates the social construction of ChatGPT technology in society by identifying and analyzing the factors that influence its adoption and utilization. Through this analysis, we aim to identify recent research trends, gaps, and future research opportunities. The study utilizes data from various international scientific journals indexed by Scopus to explore the application of social construction of technology techniques and their societal impact. The method used in this research is bibliometric analysis to uncover patterns in the study of the social construction of ChatGPT technology in society. The results show that user perceptions of ChatGPT are influenced by digital readiness, technological literacy, as well as perceptions of benefits and risks. Additionally, ChatGPT is closely related to the development of critical skills among students, supporting the enhancement of analytical and critical abilities. The research focus in the field of AI, particularly concerning social and economic impacts, is expanding. This study emphasizes the importance of AI in various aspects of life and its contribution to sustainable development, especially in higher education, where AI technology integration is involved. Educational institutions are encouraged to design policies to support learning and skill development through AI. This research has limitations, particularly in terms of sample size and methodology, which can be addressed in future studies by expanding the scope and methods of the research. Overall, this study enriches the understanding of the impact of AI technology, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education and provides a foundation for further research.
References
A. M. Sirojjudin and N. Irwansyah, “Interpretative Flexibility and Social Construction on the Use of Mobile Health Applications (Case Study on Halodoc),” J. Penelit. Komun. Dan Opini Publik, vol. 24, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.33299/jpkop.24.2.3308.
J. Faludi, “Hack for impact – sociomateriality and the emergent structuration of social hackathons,” J. Organ. Ethnogr., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 223–241, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JOE-12-2022-0036.
H. Arruda, É. Silva, M. Lessa, D. Júnior, and R. Bartholo, “Vosviewer and bibliometrix,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 392–395, 2022, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1434.
A. Caputo and M. Kargina, “A user-friendly method to merge scopus and web of science data during bibliometric analysis,” J. Mark. Anal., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41270-021-00142-7.
D. Guleria and G. Kaur, “Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using vosviewer and rstudio bibliometrix, 1989–2019,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1001–1024, 2021, doi: 10.1108/lht-09-2020-0218.
S. Secinaro, D. Calandra, A. Secinaro, V. Muthurangu, and P. Biancone, “The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review,” BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01488-9.
K. Tsilika, “Exploring the contributions to mathematical economics: a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix and vosviewer,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 4703, 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11224703.
V. Hyk and O. Vysochan, “Integrated reporting of mining enterprises: bibliometric analysis,” Stud. Bus. Econ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 90–99, 2022, doi: 10.2478/sbe-2022-0048.
R. Ullah, I. Asghar, and M. Griffiths, “An integrated methodology for bibliometric analysis: a case study of internet of things in healthcare applications,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 67, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s23010067.
S. Novitasari, “Examining financial behavior and decision-making: a bibliometric study of trends and insights,” West Sci. Account. Financ., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 69–78, 2023, doi: 10.58812/wsaf.v1i02.132.
E. YAVUZ, “Bibliometric analysis for use of time series in animal science,” Black Sea J. Agric., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 700–705, 2023, doi: 10.47115/bsagriculture.1376895.
K. Amirbagheri, A. Núñez-Carballosa, L. Guitart-Tarrés, and J. Merigó, “Research on green supply chain: a bibliometric analysis,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10098-018-1624-1.
A. Ninkov, J. Frank, and L. Maggio, “Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing,” Perspect. Med. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 173–176, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4.
I. Passas, “Bibliometric analysis: the main steps,” Encyclopedia, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1014–1025, 2024, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia4020065.
B. Fahimnia, J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani, Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis, vol. 162. Elsevier, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi (SISFOTEK)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
